Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:08:26 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <netchild@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx> Subject: Re: DTrace (or other monitor) access to LBA of a block device Message-ID: <4CFD0A7A.7030505@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20101206155953.18474dz6i2p4njhk@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <AANLkTi=2Ln5s-mD%2B%2B-iKEq2v-1f31fpavXB7kUfTC2Lf@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikWoCmRQE6VDG1S88s5UCtXY7acP1Q_pwo=gYY%2B@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTim2VCanQ1Sp15GU5Td8bL=J-8drkoZPKqTgbwtv@mail.gmail.com> <4CFBE887.6010704@freebsd.org> <AANLkTim8LqFMG3xhiDO8FvLKiozYRKHmHycQ=tr66KaU@mail.gmail.com> <20101206155953.18474dz6i2p4njhk@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 06/12/2010 16:59 Alexander Leidinger said the following: > I do not think it is trivial. The amount of discussion around this does not makes > me want to do a MFC. Sorry, I must have missed the discussion. Could you please clarify what is not trivial in this case? The change itself seems to be just a few lines... Are there any prerequisite changes, or some politics, or etc? -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CFD0A7A.7030505>