Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:59:59 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net> Subject: Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default Message-ID: <4ED8776F.9060301@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111202064132.GC88903@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <CADe0-4=DwzFj1NbJTeq3p92YGF_5yjhc-Yajn-hHNB_aca1k2g@mail.gmail.com> <20111202015133.GA4111@dragon.NUXI.org> <CADe0-4n2rXvoo4K%2BCHd-JBCHJ56OdTJTpzsF1r2X1yvcLt5CEA@mail.gmail.com> <20111202064132.GC88903@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/01/2011 22:41, Steve Kargl wrote: > Having a set of profiled libraries in-sync with the static > and shared libraries allows one to run the profiler on their > code when someone changes a library and that change causes > a dramatic change in the performance of one's code. And as Max pointed out in his OP, that only applies to a tiny fraction of our users, or even our developers. If you want to use them, turn the knob. > PS: David was not complaining about "fixing a 17 year old bug". > He was stating that a single day of discussion changing > a 17 year old practice seems a little too brief. If it's a good idea, it's a good idea no matter how many different ways we flog it. :) Doug -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ED8776F.9060301>