Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:39:41 +0100 (CET)
From:      Andreas Schwarz <freebsd.asc@strcmp.org>
To:        freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: PINE64 - 12.0-CURRENT r324563 - ntpd can't keep time
Message-ID:  <4b021ad4813.3aa2749e@mail.schwarzes.net>
In-Reply-To: <3e6a8ce3-1b12-1557-ad0c-7b2259ced263@restart.be>
References:  <d85f883f-84c2-5051-1996-2a0e73a2c1e7@restart.be> <4BF75B1E-318C-414A-B5D4-4BA7D6578316@dsl-only.net> <1509029871.56824.49.camel@freebsd.org> <c2bff518-89ce-4956-2548-e56afab5d83d@restart.be> <4af740148ca.47a474e3@mail.schwarzes.net> <04b67007-a95a-9e40-28b4-764adf8b2ded@restart.be> <FCA144E8-121A-48A5-8CDB-101FBDE6E84C@dsl-only.net> <dceb4702-8ede-aadd-17d8-ed41436955ad@restart.be> <4aff37249b6.70779c93@mail.schwarzes.net> <3e6a8ce3-1b12-1557-ad0c-7b2259ced263@restart.be>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16.11.17, Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 11/14/2017 23:03, Andreas Schwarz wrote:
>>
>> If you disable the ntpd, what time drift do you measure per day?
>> 
> With nrpd disabled, while running svn update on /usr/ports, after 1/2 
> hour the clock was 6 minutes in the future.

I've made the test with my Pine64, I've disabled the ntpd and set the pine
under heavy load at all cores for a hour. There was no time drift.

You wrote in your previous email, that the problem appear when you set the 
freq to 1200. With higher freq the system consumes more power (not much, but 
more), do you have checked your power adapter, is the 5V stable under high 
load?

-asc




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4b021ad4813.3aa2749e>