Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:09:34 +0000
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        John E Hein <jhein@timing.com>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: tt_ioctl 
Message-ID:  <50325.1207757374@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:06:30 CST." <18428.59782.318085.53492@gromit.timing.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <18428.59782.318085.53492@gromit.timing.com>, John E Hein writes:

>That said... if we do decide to _not_ hook up t_ioctl, then we should
>just remove it entirely since it's misleading that it's there but not
>hooked up.

Well, if we agree that you should use a non-tty device, we may still
miss the poster child ioctl to make the decision...

>The only thing that remains then (if we remove it) would be what to do
>with the drivers that have been broken for 3+ years since the ioctl
>pass-through was removed (digi and the usb driver or two I mentioned
>in the previous email).

Also a good question.  A check in the PR database is probably first
order of business.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50325.1207757374>