Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:01:37 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Olsson <pol@leissner.se> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to install new dialog for ports on FreeBsd 7.0 Message-ID: <514B12C1.7030206@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130321134248.GQ949@pol-server.leissner.se> References: <CAEd%2Bihz%2Bo6c_gbqdni-N7EfBjo=WZpXd3%2BrbbBY9zaC=A14quw@mail.gmail.com> <20130321075634.GB34508@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAEd%2BihzcvqJrN3XRYtuBDjkwRFj-Y5ry2p84w-yWvqPK3cYpFA@mail.gmail.com> <20130321094928.GB45222@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20130321102155.GH949@pol-server.leissner.se> <514AFA48.3020602@FreeBSD.org> <20130321134248.GQ949@pol-server.leissner.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2WTCASUGAFXPGIPUPATHI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 3/21/2013 8:42 AM, Peter Olsson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 07:17:12AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 3/21/2013 5:21 AM, Peter Olsson wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:49:29AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 03:06:43PM +0530, Vikas Mahajan wrote: >>>>> On 21 March 2013 13:26, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote= : >>>>> >>>>>> Try replacing the ports-mgmt/pkg/files/patch-Makefile by this one:= >>>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/patch-Makefile >>>>> There was no file named patch-Makefile. I created new file with con= tents as >>>>> given by you, but still getting same error. >>>>> >>>>>> And tell me if it works. >>>>>> >>>>>> But please notice that 7.x is EOLed 28 feb, more and more the port= s tree >>>>> will >>>>>> get incompatible, and if we want to follow the direction for FreeB= SD 10 >>>>> (replace >>>>>> our make by bmake) we will need to a day or another break totally >>>>> compatibility >>>>>> with 7. >>>>>> >>>>>> Consider upgrading your boxes. >>>>> I repeated same steps on March 13th on some other box and everythin= g works. >>>>> Introduction of new dialog created problem. Steps, I followed to ge= t latest >>>>> ports: >>>>> # portsnap fetch >>>>> # mv /usr/ports /usr/ports_old >>>>> # portsnap extract >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --=20 >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Vikas Mahajan >>>> >>>> I just tested on a 7.x it works out of the box. I don't know what is= happening >>>> on your system. or maybe portsnap for unknown reason is giving a wro= ng old >>>> version. >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> Bapt >>> >>> I get the sqrt error while trying to install dialog4ports on >>> all my servers that are still running 7.4. I try installing >> >> 7.4 is EOL. If you want to continue using it you will need to use >> RELEASE_7_EOL. head is not supported. >=20 > I know that, and I don't care about this error in > my servers. They are scheduled for upgrade to 8 or 9. > I just replied to Bapt's comment that he got it to work > in 7.x, because I had seen the same problem as Vikas. > I should have made this clear in my reply. > =20 >>> And, for the record, I'm really pi**ed off about the way that >>> this clear POLA violation was introduced without mention in >>> ports UPDATING. I ran portmaster upgrades in several servers >>> (7.4, 8.3 and 9.0) yesterday, and all of them just skipped >>> every config dialog with this error: >>> env: /usr/local/bin/dialog4ports: No such file or directory >> >> UPDATING is for *manual port changes needed for upgrading*. This *was*= >> documented in CHANGES which is for ports infrastructure updates. >> >> It's not fair to call a bug a POLA violation. It should be fixed now. >=20 > So this env problem was just a bug in portmaster? > Ok, I didn't know that, I thought it was a general > problem with dialog4ports. Then I'm sorry I called > it a POLA violation. The problems with it building and missing should both be fixed now. Those were bugs with the dialog4ports support. >=20 > However I still think that this change in the ports > environment could have justified a mention in UPDATING, > since CHANGES is aimed at developers and committers, not > ordinary users like myself. That's a fair point. I'll add an entry. >=20 > Peter Olsson >=20 --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery bdrewery@freenode/EFNet ------enig2WTCASUGAFXPGIPUPATHI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRSxLHAAoJEG54KsA8mwz5Dv4P/0fv3iROrBrFDL8w/HQPyQFR hOLZBINeCUCYJw9rzsJxvWsX/O4/IQrSJfl53fcC6EGH6KnaV5aDLOSbHhZoJO6T qeS3QKXNS0OsH5tJ4fOdJx3wC9whoUQu2rZ7sT45gM+u2YALBYkLkqOEC6EuaOxE EsrTPfSegeKiSNWDu355U7dSU/cBp1eh3M8VJuhhWtg72aZ1FTZIw1x+1DT0f83L F8HClp75z4N78qE7UnBb50wUBE16v4sGs4JzkvdPK52MdPSykE9lok1F+2JLsB/Z LACCUgoqsUlX3S76+/E9m3JDcuHIa9+5EWstg1F0R4JMljTA4cZyBhUPFkz0hmZX ruQM+DId25d9hE7FQVuRMP5FQPnwJtZs0NuOFIKLzy/3Qo9blTR64rncX1JpFKMB gZseujVuslsA63OvuZ78/GlueI/FuISVIAyEM9FhJWMqfAAFpIeI+6RGYChHVO5e iSKHUR5DDLqby1tzHhG7LS722nQ/gbcZ+oIu6OrFVB8m5mw85rxtwXo3Mjli/oI8 BDxzJYRYVOeZbfO0O/Ox2OFN9p/BJW0vHmj/QzT6gF2svraeGe5udCFYwQQyyYC+ ReLiBHq+OL3BFDSV+wH9YyQ0LstXwSZd0WPdiSd/gO2KGEnBYDMAgZmv+EVTzjbE nq5aSb11of9c3L+B315U =yJpW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2WTCASUGAFXPGIPUPATHI--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?514B12C1.7030206>