Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Nov 2013 14:02:21 +0100
From:      Florent Peterschmitt <florent@peterschmitt.fr>
To:        geoffroy desvernay <dgeo@centrale-marseille.fr>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: lang/php5 - separate apache module from php5 port
Message-ID:  <5290A75D.2070305@peterschmitt.fr>
In-Reply-To: <52909D92.8060308@centrale-marseille.fr>
References:  <51DDC8B0.6090604@peterschmitt.fr> <1373490714.2623.19.camel@ArchNrz> <51DDCF90.70605@peterschmitt.fr> <51DDD202.9050005@gmx.de> <51DDD606.2020907@peterschmitt.fr> <51DDD811.6000501@gmx.de> <51DFFD47.3000900@peterschmitt.fr> <52909D92.8060308@centrale-marseille.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--1DTdflEsCtgqiFBskJU9eCJoLMI6QAIwJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 23/11/13 13:20, geoffroy desvernay wrote:
> On 12/07/2013 14:57, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
>> Le 10/07/2013 23:54, olli hauer a =C3=A9crit :
>>>> Here it would be ap22-mod_php5 and ap24-mod_php5.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thats what I thought with your first mail and I suspect this is a goo=
d idea.
>>
>> Yep, it was what I meant. So do you think I should contact the maintai=
ner ?
>>
> I second this, as php-fpm is more and more used, with apache, nginx,
> lighttpd... There are also cases where only php-cli is needed (at least=

> we use that too)
>=20
> I like the way debian handle this: php-cli/php-fpm/php-cgi/php-module
> are packaged independently (and in freebsd we could have ap22-mod-php
> and ap24-mod-php).
>=20
> The difficulty may be that it would make some more ports to maintain fo=
r
> Alex, who may need some help (?)
>=20
> My 2 cts...
>=20
> ps: re-using this thread as I didn't find (missed?) any more recent
> discussion about this...
>=20

Yeah, Debian's package split is nice (and not only for PHP but
everything else). But I'm not sure if we want to make x packages we have
to make x ports. I mean, it is very useful when distributing packages
and I'm not sure the port system cannot make x packages from 1 only port.=


--=20
Florent Peterschmitt           | Please:
florent@peterschmitt.fr        |  * Avoid HTML/RTF in E-mail.
+33 (0)6 64 33 97 92           |  * Send PDF for documents.
http://florent.peterschmitt.fr |  * Trim your quotations. Really.
Proudly powered by Open Source | Thank you :)


--1DTdflEsCtgqiFBskJU9eCJoLMI6QAIwJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=seU+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1DTdflEsCtgqiFBskJU9eCJoLMI6QAIwJ--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5290A75D.2070305>