Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:07:18 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?xYF1a2FzeiBXxIVzaWtvd3NraQ==?= <lukasz@wasikowski.net> To: wishmaster <artemrts@ukr.net> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advice/guidance requested. Message-ID: <52D3C8E6.5030907@wasikowski.net> In-Reply-To: <1389516744.523477025.przufqea@frv34.ukr.net> References: <52D1A7D5.32720.65E995@g8kbvdave.gmail.com> <1389491895.26149.69590497.27B13D4C@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1389516744.523477025.przufqea@frv34.ukr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
W dniu 2014-01-12 10:09, wishmaster pisze: >> I would also recommend ezjails. Using fat jails is often completely >> unnecessary. > > Do you think using ezjail you will obtain "thin" jails? You are wrong. Setup 5...10 jails for applications: one jail for web-applications on php, one for java and so on. And you will see how your jails will be FAT! And now imagine update system and software procedure. > So, if you need a lot of "light" isolation containers, ezjail is not your way. > I use self written scripts which creates one base system with all needed packages and a lot of "containers" with vnet supports and with "security in mind". Upgrading is very easy, just one jail. Sounds nice, maybe write some blog post or even a more detailed mail to this list with some how-to? I'm sure many people would find this very interesting. -- best regards, Lukasz Wasikowski
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52D3C8E6.5030907>