Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:04:48 +0000
From:      Joe Holden <lists@rewt.org.uk>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Import of DragonFly Mail Agent
Message-ID:  <530B2750.3050200@rewt.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <37319.1393239415@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <20140223211155.GS1699@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAFY7cWBh0ThajQpK4wZYj0wPrhTL608wtNDQNvOLnryjp4_jCg@mail.gmail.com> <530B13CA.6000005@rewt.org.uk> <33612.1393235765@critter.freebsd.dk> <20140224100036.GA1699@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <530B2500.5030608@rewt.org.uk> <37319.1393239415@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24/02/2014 10:56, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <530B2500.5030608@rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes:
>
>> Can I also suggest that ntp.org shouldn't be in the base either? :P
>
> I absolutely agree, but the replacement is less clear in that case.
>
>
I'd suggest openntpd as a candidate as it would require less work than 
dntpd since that has some kernel changes.

At ~400K it is pretty lightweight and doesn't listen at all by default, 
suitable as a default ntpd that just maintains time - one can always 
install ntp.org from ports should they need more features (such as 
access control and monlist, etc)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?530B2750.3050200>