Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 18:43:28 -0500 From: Alan Cox <alc@rice.edu> To: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1Tw6liYXN0aWVuIFDDqWRyb24=?= <dumbbell@FreeBSD.org>, Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org>, Alan Cox <alc@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r269728 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 arm/arm i386/i386 i386/xen mips/mips powerpc/aim powerpc/booke powerpc/powerpc sparc64/sparc64 vm Message-ID: <53E6B220.5020407@rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <53E69892.1050000@FreeBSD.org> References: <53e504e3.2f94.dca1d13@svn.freebsd.org> <53E69892.1050000@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/09/2014 16:54, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote: > Hello! > > I'm able to reproduce the following panic quite reliably by doing an > installkernel or installworld on sparc64: > uma_small_alloc: free page 0xfffff8003ce5c6b0 still has mappings! > > Here's the dump information: > https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/sparc64/r269728-info.6.txt > https://people.freebsd.org/~dumbbell/sparc64/r269728-textdump.6.tar > > After reverting r269728, the panic didn't occur after a dozen installkernel. > > Do you need more information? > When you say that you reverted r269728, did you revert just that one revision? r269728 makes no functional change on sparc64. So, I can't see how it could have any effect at all. Alan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53E6B220.5020407>