Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:31:55 -0800 From: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-projects@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r295280 - projects/release-pkg/release/packages Message-ID: <56B3C34B.1080501@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201602042120.u14LKQ2b026571@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201602042120.u14LKQ2b026571@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/04/16 13:20, Glen Barber wrote: > Author: gjb > Date: Thu Feb 4 21:20:26 2016 > New Revision: 295280 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/295280 > > Log: > Add package files for libc, libedit, librtld_db, and libthr. > > libedit is needed for sh(1), which if updated before runtime, > can cause undesirable behavior. > > For the rest, the installation order needs to be: > > 1) librtld > 2) libc > 3) libthr > > The dependency listing and shilbs_required entries ensure this > behavior. Are we really planning to split up the system at this level of granularity? That seems like a huge regression from one of the main selling points of FreeBSD: that it is *not* split up at this level and forms a unified system. -Nathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56B3C34B.1080501>