Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:38:04 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Perry Hutchison <perryh@pluto.rain.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: unexpected package dependency Message-ID: <56C45B9C.7090808@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <56c43d57.Pot24goK72QkTKqk%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <56c43d57.Pot24goK72QkTKqk%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17/02/2016 11:28, Perry Hutchison wrote: > I had not expected to find gcc listed (in packagesite.yaml) as a > dependency of the sysutils/cpuburn package. I can understand a > _port_ needing gcc (at build time), but does the cpuburn _package_ > actually require gcc at _runtime_? > I don't believe so. AFAIR, it builds static binaries. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56C45B9C.7090808>