Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 17:45:45 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Tomoaki NISHIYAMA <tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Cc: rwhitesel@nbase-xyplex.com, soda@sra.co.jp, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c Message-ID: <5756.926523945@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 13 May 1999 00:38:25 %2B0900." <19990513003825D.tomoaki@moss.nibb.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>phk> > Since newconfig appears technically superior, what are the issues that >phk> >are hindering its acceptance? >phk> >phk> That we want to have no "config" at all. > >That is too short an answer. No, it is complete and to the point. >What is the definition of "config"? config(8) >Why do you want to remove it? Why should we, as a 3rd millenium OS need a static config tool ? Tell me which future technology we will need to handle which will require static config ? We are working on FreeBSD as a OS for the future, not for the past. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5756.926523945>