Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:33:51 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net>, Shteryana Shopova <syrinx@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, "Constantine A. Murenin" <cnst@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Porting OpenBSD's sysctl hw.sensors framework to FreeBSD Message-ID: <57627.1184175231@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:05:46 %2B0200." <20070711190546.4b202080@deskjail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20070711190546.4b202080@deskjail>, Alexander Leidinger writes: >Quoting "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> (Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:54:40 +0000): >You are focusing on physical devices which are specially build as a >sensor for some specific stuff. I put my focus on the kernel framework >which allows to unify the handling of sensoric data from kernel >devices. I'm trying to point out that your kernel framework belongs in userland. There is no benefit from having it in the kernel. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57627.1184175231>