Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 06 Dec 2000 13:59:13 +0100
From:      "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com>
To:        'Andrew Gallatin' <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   RE: part numbers for 2100 5/300 processor modules?
Message-ID:  <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D7A8B@l04.research.kpn.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> Once we get the machine booting, it would be interesting to play with
> it with that bad card in place.
> 
Interesting. This kind of discussion crops up in the yearly "help my machine
is sig 11-ing everything"--threads on freebsd-hackers/questions. The outcome
is rather different over there, usually along the lines of "Just replace the
RAM and don't even think of bloating the kernel with bad memory detectors".

Is the Alpha memory management so much better that we can reliably detect
the bulk of the memory errors, or is it that Alpha RAM isn't as cheap as the
sand it was molten from and thus more precious?

    Kees Jan

================================================
 You are only young once,
       but you can stay immature all your life.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D7A8B>