Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 May 2018 01:08:45 +0700
From:      Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
To:        Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Abdullah Tariq <ab.tariq90@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: NETGRAPH- bridge vlans using netgraph help
Message-ID:  <5AE75BAD.8030303@grosbein.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ7uAPJ3EaoLktQ%2BBVTBt7LrKjmhK0FpCY6X3u%2B0YWYGGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAPFxuwQOBkGTHZbGfJz=-fUW8M%2BQGOpTM9T%2B-RO6H4fWcGEtqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPFxuwRceDDoTw-4EohRdjUMSE-YN4YKWhbObuvEpxzEWOh2_A@mail.gmail.com> <5AE34754.6040905@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwQ5TwZnnW%2B1TT7urq_0pgb=sM_VwH4x0eq0363MCdb7hw@mail.gmail.com> <5AE34CFA.7000207@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwR54nPiKAAACRY5a_GvDNOVfdniqv6F_3PK4--7vm03uA@mail.gmail.com> <5AE437C1.8010706@grosbein.net> <CAFZYVy7_nVm5G1XDdM_TujN=jVbCyDEKABGbC=M9L5Lh1jAAzQ@mail.gmail.com> <5AE44ADD.7020302@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwQ=Gi7GiVr%2BsdTavr6r44ftaeFDOvN7%2B3qi_7aZyH6kXw@mail.gmail.com> <5AE468D5.9030702@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwRdLrEmtVHGSruja6L-bcOi0Z59ae5mB1gWgi-PvU6inw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ6m=j6aY7nbeppCK9TTAJ1P%2BfN7Hs5sZ3CfWc7Ad4v_cA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ62BQ3WZVvpZ0D9UJFcV4stXm-prE=GDp-JconSktQzpA@mail.gmail.com> <5AE4D1AC.3080702@grosbein.net> <CAOjFWZ7AchG8HEvURSNGXGeqYiYaSn4Uo=rBgGoFqLAbAdOMJw@mail.gmail.com> <5AE75988.3020306@grosbein.net> <CAOjFWZ7uAPJ3EaoLktQ%2BBVTBt7LrKjmhK0FpCY6X3u%2B0YWYGGQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
01.05.2018 1:03, Freddie Cash wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net <mailto:eugen@grosbein.net>>wrote:
> 
>     > What the OP is trying to do is have PC1 send untagged packets to igb0 on FreeBSD which is configured for tagged vlan 5.
>     > Then bridge the packets to igb1 which is also configured for tagged vlan 5.  Then send the packets out, untagged, to PC2.
> 
>     Why would one want to "configure igb0 for tagged vlan 5" when igb0 supposed to receive untagged frames?
>     This does not make any sense. One should just bridge igb0 as is, without creation vlan on it and problem's solved.
> 
> ​Yes, agree.  What the OP wants to do can't be done.  :)​

Perhaps, you missed a message from him when he states that configuration style does no matter for him really.
So, what he wants can be done, just using different style.
 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5AE75BAD.8030303>