Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:25:45 +0530 From: Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@kathe.in> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Sending Tcsh to packages/ports ... Message-ID: <64780f09d4251b9641e3bca39000ae2d@kathe.in>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Since Tcsh is usually imported, why not send it to packages/ports collection? I agree that "csh" is an historically important artifact, but do we need to still rely on that? I have been using "csh" ever since I started using FreeBSD, liked it, but it doesn't feel light like plain old "sh" nor is as feature-full as "bash". To top that, the installer asks me to choose between "csh" and "tcsh" in-spite of being the same binary.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?64780f09d4251b9641e3bca39000ae2d>