Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:10:38 -0300 From: "Gilberto Villani Brito" <linux@giboia.org> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: floating keep state Message-ID: <6e6841490802271310o3e5976a4gef2cb507087c01b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1635d77d0802271143u2aeb0b13we310ea1a611afaa8@mail.gmail.com> References: <1635d77d0802271143u2aeb0b13we310ea1a611afaa8@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I didnt understand this rule: pass in quick proto tcp to <www_servers> port $www_tcp_ports flags S/SA keep state I think is: pass in quick proto tcp from any to <www_servers> port $www_tcp_ports flags S/SA keep state -- Gilberto Villani Brito System Administrator Londrina - PR Brazil gilbertovb(a)gmail.com On 27/02/2008, Vadym Chepkov <vchepkov@gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > I must be doing something wrong, but I can't figure it out. > I actually simplify the network structure, to keep it simple > > - a client and a web server are on different network segments; > - all incoming connections to the client are prohibited; > - client should be allowed to access web server and get a reply; > > Here are the rules: > > set state-policy floating > pass in quick proto tcp to <www_servers> port $www_tcp_ports flags > S/SA keep state > block in log to <protected_dev_net> > > In the pflog I can see that reply packet from www server is blocked on > server's segment interface. I thought 'set state-policy floating' > should create a rule interface independent and allow a reply? Am I > wrong? > > Thank you, > > Vadym Chepkov > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6e6841490802271310o3e5976a4gef2cb507087c01b>