Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:44:59 +0200 From: rainer@ultra-secure.de To: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> Cc: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS... Message-ID: <70fac2fe3f23f85dd442d93ffea368e1@ultra-secure.de> In-Reply-To: <17B373DA-4AFC-4D25-B776-0D0DED98B320@sorbs.net> References: <30506b3d-64fb-b327-94ae-d9da522f3a48@sorbs.net> <CAOtMX2gf3AZr1-QOX_6yYQoqE-H%2B8MjOWc=eK1tcwt5M3dCzdw@mail.gmail.com> <56833732-2945-4BD3-95A6-7AF55AB87674@sorbs.net> <3d0f6436-f3d7-6fee-ed81-a24d44223f2f@netfence.it> <17B373DA-4AFC-4D25-B776-0D0DED98B320@sorbs.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 2019-04-30 10:09, schrieb Michelle Sullivan: > Now, yes most production environments have multiple backing stores so > will have a server or ten to switch to whilst the store is being > recovered, but it still wouldn’t be a pleasant experience... not to > mention the possibility that if one store is corrupted there is a > chance that the other store(s) would also be affected in the same way > if in the same DC... (Eg a DC fire - which I have seen) .. and if you > have multi DC stores to protect from that.. size of the pipes between > DCs comes clearly into play. I have one customer with about 13T of ZFS - and because it would take a while to restore (actual backups), it zfs-sends delta-snapshots every hour to a standby-system. It was handy when we had to rebuild the system with different HBAs.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70fac2fe3f23f85dd442d93ffea368e1>