Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 06:21:48 +0100 From: "Martin Hepworth" <maxsec@gmail.com> To: Pollywog <lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix? Message-ID: <72cf361e0709302221h1a272d0fgfccfe176ff9f67da@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200709302038.03763.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> References: <4700052A.7050008@gracenpeace.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070930152732.02576438@mail.computinginnovations.com> <200709302038.03763.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mailscanner and postfix is perfect combination...no problems with the correct installation type. http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:mta:postfix:politics -- Martin On 9/30/07, Pollywog <lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> wrote: > > On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:28:23 Derek Ragona wrote: > > At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote: > > >I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde > for > > >mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for > > >primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV > > >scanning would be a plus too. > > > > > > ...jgm > > > > I use mailscanner with sendmail which uses spamassasin with clamav. All > > from the ports. > > I used Mailscanner at one time, but it is not recommended for use with > Postfix > because mail can be lost. It never happened to me, but it has happened to > others. I believe the Postfix website mentions these problems. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?72cf361e0709302221h1a272d0fgfccfe176ff9f67da>