Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:48:13 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Klaus_K=C3=BCchemann?= <maciphone2@googlemail.com> To: Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, myfreeweb <greg@unrelenting.technology>, dan.kotowski@a9development.com Subject: Re: Any good alternative to Raspberry for Arm64? Message-ID: <74C08272-D40E-42D2-A623-CEE12C661329@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <cc9bc6a4-4012-8f66-2dd6-6b9e552438ea@spth.de> References: <21BE83BC-0667-44F7-83E4-1664A2BC6017@icloud.com> <E4905B08-79AD-4B48-87A0-3E0EF3027C8B@googlemail.com> <cc9bc6a4-4012-8f66-2dd6-6b9e552438ea@spth.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 28.03.2021 um 21:31 schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de>: >=20 > Am 28.03.21 um 06:54 schrieb Klaus K=C3=BCchemann via freebsd-arm: >=20 >>=20 >> The `professional` answer is : >>=20 >> of course , starting @~$500-$700(without accessories like RAM etc.) >> you can buy aarch64-dev-boards which completely outperform the RPI4=20= >> in performance and connectivity ;-) >=20 > But isn't there a big risk that those exotic powerful boards might not > work or not work well with FreeBSD, since few developers have them, = and > no one considers them important enoug to make sure releases work on = them? e.g. you can ask 'the unrelenting myfreeweb-man=E2=80=98 :-) & the = board-owner Dan K. (added to CC) for the =E2=80=9Ewhat works, what = doesn=E2=80=99t=E2=80=9C- status of the LX2K =E2=80=A6 while I would call it less a risk then more a challenge to work with = boards like that(that=E2=80=99s why you would buy one). well=E2=80=A6 so many topics in one thread.. funny...see you later... Regards K.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?74C08272-D40E-42D2-A623-CEE12C661329>