Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Sep 2016 22:32:13 +0200
From:      Julien Charbon <jch@freebsd.org>
To:        Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, hiren panchasara <hiren@strugglingcoder.info>
Cc:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load
Message-ID:  <78cbcdc9-f565-1046-c157-2ddd8fcccc62@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160916190330.GG2840@zxy.spb.ru>
References:  <20160904215739.GC22212@zxy.spb.ru> <20160905014612.GA42393@strugglingcoder.info> <20160914213503.GJ2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160915085938.GN38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20160915090633.GS2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160916181839.GC2960@zxy.spb.ru> <20160916183053.GL9397@strugglingcoder.info> <20160916190330.GG2840@zxy.spb.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--MikMWBCTJh2GK09JwCirqxaop1nePIMxP
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="mgBFvcdIF2aRPu3PPAA6UmtpRvir4s5j4";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Julien Charbon <jch@freebsd.org>
To: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>,
 hiren panchasara <hiren@strugglingcoder.info>
Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <78cbcdc9-f565-1046-c157-2ddd8fcccc62@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load
References: <20160904215739.GC22212@zxy.spb.ru>
 <20160905014612.GA42393@strugglingcoder.info>
 <20160914213503.GJ2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160915085938.GN38409@kib.kiev.ua>
 <20160915090633.GS2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160916181839.GC2960@zxy.spb.ru>
 <20160916183053.GL9397@strugglingcoder.info>
 <20160916190330.GG2840@zxy.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20160916190330.GG2840@zxy.spb.ru>

--mgBFvcdIF2aRPu3PPAA6UmtpRvir4s5j4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


 Hi Slawa,

On 9/16/16 9:03 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:30:53AM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>=20
>> On 09/16/16 at 09:18P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:06:33PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:59:38AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:=

>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:35:04AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:=

>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>>>>>>> I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC).
>>>>>>>> Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system =
go to
>>>>>>>> unresponsible state -- no reaction to network and console (USB I=
PMI
>>>>>>>> emulation). INVARIANTS give to high overhad. Is this exist some =
way to
>>>>>>>> debug this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you panic it from console to get to db> to get backtrace and =
other
>>>>>>> info when it goes unresponsive?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ipmi console don't respond (chassis power diag don't react)
>>>>>> login on sol console stuck on *tcp.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is 'login' you reference is the ipmi client state, or you mean logi=
n(1)
>>>>> on the wedged host ?
>>>>
>>>> on the wedged host
>>>>
>>>>> If BMC stops responding simultaneously with the host, I would suspe=
ct
>>>>> the hardware platform issues instead of a software problem.  Do you=
 have
>>>>> dedicated LAN port for BMC ?
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>> But BMC emulate USB keyboard and this is may be lock inside USB
>>>> system.
>>>> "ipmi console don't respond" must be read as "ipmi console runnnig a=
nd
>>>> attached but system don't react to keypress on this console".
>>>> at the sime moment system respon to `enter` on ipmi sol console, but=

>>>> after enter `root` stuck in login in the '*tcp' state (I think this =
is
>>>> NIS related).
>>>
>>> ~^B don't break to debuger.
>>> But I can login to sol console.
>>
>> You can probably:
>> debug.kdb.enter: set to enter the debugger
>>
>> or force a panic and get vmcore:
>> debug.kdb.panic: set to panic the kernel
>=20
> I am reset this host.
> PMC samples collected and decoded:
>=20
> @ CPU_CLK_UNHALTED_CORE [4653445 samples]
>=20
> 51.86%  [2413083]  lock_delay @ /boot/kernel.VSTREAM/kernel
>  100.0%  [2413083]   __rw_wlock_hard
>   100.0%  [2413083]    tcp_tw_2msl_scan
>    99.99%  [2412958]     pfslowtimo
>     100.0%  [2412958]      softclock_call_cc
>      100.0%  [2412958]       softclock
>       100.0%  [2412958]        intr_event_execute_handlers
>        100.0%  [2412958]         ithread_loop
>         100.0%  [2412958]          fork_exit
>    00.01%  [125]         tcp_twstart
>     100.0%  [125]          tcp_do_segment
>      100.0%  [125]           tcp_input
>       100.0%  [125]            ip_input
>        100.0%  [125]             swi_net
>         100.0%  [125]              intr_event_execute_handlers
>          100.0%  [125]               ithread_loop
>           100.0%  [125]                fork_exit

 The only write lock tcp_tw_2msl_scan() tries to get is a
INP_WLOCK(inp).  Thus here, tcp_tw_2msl_scan() seems to be stuck
spinning on INP_WLOCK (or pfslowtimo() is going crazy and calls
tcp_tw_2msl_scan() at high rate but this will be quite unexpected).

 Thus my hypothesis is that something is holding the INP_WLOCK and not
releasing it, and tcp_tw_2msl_scan() is spinning on it.

 If you can, could you compile the kernel with below options:

options        DDB                     # Support DDB.
options        DEADLKRES               # Enable the deadlock resolver
options        INVARIANTS              # Enable calls of extra sanity
checking
options        INVARIANT_SUPPORT       # Extra sanity checks of internal
structures, required by INVARIANTS
options        WITNESS                 # Enable checks to detect
deadlocks and cycles
options        WITNESS_SKIPSPIN        # Don't run witness on spinlocks
for speed

 And once the issue is reproduce, run in ddb run the below commands:

show pcpu
show allpcpu
show locks
show alllocks
show lockchain
show allchains
show all trace

 This is to see if the contention is indeed on the tcp_tw_2msl_scan's
INP_WLOCK.

--
Julien




--mgBFvcdIF2aRPu3PPAA6UmtpRvir4s5j4--

--MikMWBCTJh2GK09JwCirqxaop1nePIMxP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJX4EtSAAoJEKVlQ5Je6dhx7mkIAJo089e6oC5ZUq4bLa9dOiGP
NGf5Qq9DzbrrGQXI9AXCtcYUio8dSnBaK3Gkv5POxAW+7ppq9kaiznydugIZMfMC
L0A1cLmiFesvZ1BxGFxeE/P+sn1iTIgiKXFbMW4MmesmKEVwTKJ/7BgIQKX7TYUA
ZbuNLuL4yWS9HPQitb3I23pcfJ6tBRHCKORB9An6OJA76ETizodyp0mUPp9UxEXP
xKGXdmJPKpnts8eUuMOCGdBTqOghzP9gwEnq8J+0cGjcE45zErxnI5FvMx/VeGnr
xiwBb6E3/CvKURcvsDc2SDlZ6lokNM21drLzIBOX8WN++F+JG0ayKwHcxtdLebA=
=FcSq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--MikMWBCTJh2GK09JwCirqxaop1nePIMxP--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?78cbcdc9-f565-1046-c157-2ddd8fcccc62>