Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:22:21 +0900
From:      Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>
To:        Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        rwatson@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: NFS over IPv6
Message-ID:  <7m8ydqvuaq.wl@black3.imgsrc.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <7mk6xey51w.wl@black3.imgsrc.co.jp>
References:  <7mk6xey51w.wl@black3.imgsrc.co.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Thu, 8 Jul 2004 14:09:04 +0000 (UTC),
kuriyama wrote:
> With today's kernel, I see strange behavior with NFS over IPv6.  My
> userland is two days older.  I'll check with sync'ed kernel/userland
> tomorrow.
> 
> # NFS server is 5.2.1R, client is current.
> 
> When I did some write operation, it may wait too long.  I can
> sometimes write without problem, but sometimes not.  I took tcpdump -vvv:
> 
> 22:48:25.128338 2001:218:422:2::XXXX > 2001:218:422:2::YYYY: frag (0xdf59d78f:0|1448) 2001:218:422:2::XXXX.1516376639 > 2001:218:422:2::YYYY.2049: 1440 write fh 1034,59016/16299072 4586 bytes @ 0xc000 <unstable> [flowlabel 0x56097] (len 1456, hlim 64)
> 22:48:25.128371 2001:218:422:2::XXXX > 2001:218:422:2::YYYY: frag (0xdf59d78f:1448|1448) [flowlabel 0x56097] (len 1456, hlim 64)
> 22:48:25.128405 2001:218:422:2::XXXX > 2001:218:422:2::YYYY: frag (0xdf59d78f:2896|1448) [flowlabel 0x56097] (len 1456, hlim 64)
> 22:48:25.128430 2001:218:422:2::XXXX > 2001:218:422:2::YYYY: frag (0xdf59d78f:4344|400) [flowlabel 0x56097] (len 408, hlim 64)
> 22:48:25.129335 2001:218:422:2::YYYY.2049 > 2001:218:422:2::XXXX.1516376639: reply ok 160 write PRE: sz 0xd1ea mtime 1089294496.000000 ctime 1089294496.000000 POST: REG 664 ids 1000/1000 sz 0xd1ea nlink 1 rdev 199/65077248 fsid 0x420 fileid 0xf8b440 a/m/ctime 1089287695.000000 1089294502.000000 1089294502.000000 4586 bytes <unstable> (len 168, hlim 64)
> 22:48:25.129489 2001:218:422:2::XXXX > 2001:218:422:2::YYYY: [icmp6 sum ok] icmp6: 2001:218:422:2::XXXX udp port 829 unreachable (len 216, hlim 64)
> 
> I don't know why client side replied as port unreachable.  With IPv4,
> there is no problem.

I tracked to find which commit breaks.

With 2004-07-06 06:00:00+00, it's OK.  But with 2004-07-06
10:00:00+00, above problem occured.  There is alfred's NFS mobility
commits between them.

Alfred, do you have any ideas?


-- 
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc.
             <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7m8ydqvuaq.wl>