Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:43:49 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CALL FOR TESTERS: linux-f8 infrastructure ports Message-ID: <83563690@bb.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080408172617.667132avjdqmc4ao@webmail.leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Tue\, 08 Apr 2008 17\:26\:17 %2B0200") References: <72854627@bb.ipt.ru> <200804072321.19332.aline@riseup.net> <20080408120026.582326h7ubg7rd40@webmail.leidinger.net> <51403695@bb.ipt.ru> <20080408165737.21116ohrt6c8pt44@webmail.leidinger.net> <15726112@bb.ipt.ru> <20080408172617.667132avjdqmc4ao@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:26:17 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Ok, now that I think more about it, we did it like it is because it is > enough. In the package we have the generated file(s) I think, as we > don't expect other modules to be present before the install of the > gtk2 port. The question is, if this is even true in the update case (I > don't talk about the update from fc4 to f8, but about linux-gtk2-x to > linux-gtk2-(x+1)). As I understand it is enough for now. > Do we have a port with such modules? Will we have > one in the future (I would like to see some more engines supported, if > f8 doesn't come with some more by default)? Which engines you would like to see by default with f8? WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?83563690>