Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:07:43 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: "Carl Shapiro" <carl.shapiro@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious compatibility breakage in -current. Message-ID: <86abowhtz4.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4dcb5abd0711290226u69105089ya10526519e5cc12d@mail.gmail.com> (Carl Shapiro's message of "Thu\, 29 Nov 2007 02\:26\:11 -0800") References: <4dcb5abd0711290226u69105089ya10526519e5cc12d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Carl Shapiro" <carl.shapiro@gmail.com> writes: > The switch from SIGBUS to SIGSEGV is well motivated. Is it? I see no mention of it in the commit log for the revision that actually implemented the change. David argued on -CURRENT that it is more POSIXly correct, provided that he interpreted POSIX correctly; how do other operating systems behave in this case? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86abowhtz4.fsf>