Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:26:43 +0300 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: Eir Nym <eirnym@gmail.com> Cc: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mk/bsd.command.mk: missing CSH tag Message-ID: <86wro9e6e4.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinmZ2YXxMAPjghtur3n2GT-N16d0FFAc0=khb=k@mail.gmail.com> (Eir Nym's message of "Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:03:24 %2B0300") References: <4CE5280E.3090009@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <AANLkTin5v4NDNQyYDBCJ=r0OUo33vSqLF5a6rYCZQaS2@mail.gmail.com> <20101118160804.GA73849@eggman.experts-exchange.com> <AANLkTimkLmZNVWE1XG4vekHtYYrWWRk9-Jq8shJVdze1@mail.gmail.com> <ic5v05$146g$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <AANLkTinmZ2YXxMAPjghtur3n2GT-N16d0FFAc0=khb=k@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eir Nym <eirnym@gmail.com> writes: > On 19 November 2010 16:44, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote: >> Eir Nym <eirnym@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Your patch should check if tcsh is in system. it is optional component. >> >> Since when? If you are missing /bin/csh, your system is defective >> or at least nonstandard. > > It is good joke, thanks I guess he's talking about the ports tree being too fragile for some non-default configurations and not many people are willing to fix it. IOW, you can emphasize tcsh(1) being optional by stepping up to maintain shells/tcsh. ;)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86wro9e6e4.fsf>