Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:18:36 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, Tz-Huan Huang <tzhuan@csie.org> Subject: Re: Is there any way to increase the KVM? Message-ID: <86y75iah9f.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20080605065330.GA62591@eos.sc1.parodius.com> (Jeremy Chadwick's message of "Wed\, 4 Jun 2008 23\:53\:30 -0700") References: <6a7033710805302252v43a7b240x66ca3f5e3dd5fda4@mail.gmail.com> <20080603135308.GC3434@garage.freebsd.pl> <6a7033710806032317g4dbe8845h26a1196016b9c440@mail.gmail.com> <86zlq140x0.fsf@ds4.des.no> <6a7033710806041053g4a5c2fdftd7202b708bff363c@mail.gmail.com> <20080605062728.GA4278@garage.freebsd.pl> <20080605065330.GA62591@eos.sc1.parodius.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org> writes: > That's great to hear, but the point I've made regarding kmem_size not > being able to extend past 2GB (on i386 and amd64) still stands. I've > looked at the code myself, in attempt to figure out where the actual > limitation is, and the code is beyond my understanding. IIRC, it's a hardware limitation. Search the archives for "kmem_size" and my name for a full explanation. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86y75iah9f.fsf>