Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 20:09:46 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: takawata@freeBSD.org, njl@freeBSD.org, current@freeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: HPET vs other timers Message-ID: <86zm3y9hg5.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <2792.1179764955@critter.freebsd.dk> (Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Mon\, 21 May 2007 16\:29\:15 %2B0000") References: <2792.1179764955@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes: > > > I can't rememember who raised the quality of it recently, CVS will > > > know. I was sceptical, because I also have systems where HPET is > > > slow. > > I did, with your approval, almost a year ago. > Yes, I said "try it" or something of the sort. For the record, I ran with HPET timers the entire time from HPET support was first committed until I finally committed that patch - about ten months - so I did test it to the best of my ability. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86zm3y9hg5.fsf>