Date: 17 Sep 2001 17:10:11 +0100 From: Wayne Pascoe <wayne.pascoe@ehsrealtime.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: "edwin chan" <slack@suntop-cn.com> Subject: Re: how about 4.4 ? Message-ID: <86zo7tlrx8.fsf@pan.ehsrealtime.com> In-Reply-To: <001d01c13f8e$ea6b6fe0$9201a8c0@home.net> References: <001d01c13f8e$ea6b6fe0$9201a8c0@home.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"edwin chan" <slack@suntop-cn.com> writes: > hi, everbody: > I hear one of my friend told to me, 4.4 is not good as freebsd used to do, > it's true or not ? what's the deface ? How can anyone say what the quality of 4.4 is? Last I checked it hadn't been released yet. If it has been, it cetainly hasn't been out long enough to make descisions like that. > I use 4.3 version, i found if my website have so many connect to it, and all > memory eat by the processes. the kernel can't graceful kill some and keep > system alive, just die, i am unhappy with this. Please let us have the following information: Hardware description (Disks, CPU, RAM and NIC) Web server software (Apache, Zeus, etc.) Number of hits on average Number of connections when the machines starts to die (netstat -an | grep 80) Then maybe we can help. -- Wayne Pascoe <wayne.pascoe@ehsrealtime.com> Things fall apart; the center cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world. - Yeats To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86zo7tlrx8.fsf>