Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 04:48:14 +0900 From: Motomichi Matsuzaki <mzaki@e-mail.ne.jp> To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "make release" breakage - dokern.sh patch 2 Message-ID: <86zojudnr5.wl@tkc.att.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:15:09 -0700" <20001024121509.I17729@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20001024143644.A52958@bsdwins.com> <20001024121509.I17729@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi. At Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:15:09 -0700, David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > Other candidates I've been pointed to include the removal of > > /boot/boot[12] and NFS > IMO NFS needs to stay. It is *very* useful to many (including me). I vote for 'remove NFS away'. Yes, there are many people using NFS install, but it is site-specific. There are no services distributing FreeBSD via NFS in public. In such site-specific situation, you can make your *specific* floppies with NFS and without INET6 or some. IMHO, making install-floppies should be more easy. -- Motomichi Matsuzaki <mzaki@e-mail.ne.jp> Dept. of Biological Sciences, Grad. School of Science, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86zojudnr5.wl>