Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:56:10 +0000
From:      "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To:        Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Cc:        current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: newnfs pkgng database corruption?
Message-ID:  <8A9F25C5-C5E6-4373-85F9-C47642CF1BAE@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <746529932.761884.1365721847968.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
References:  <746529932.761884.1365721847968.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:10, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> Well, I have no idea why an NFS server would reply errno 70 if the file
> still exists, unless the client has somehow sent a bogus file handle
> to the server. (I am not aware of any client bug that might do that. I
> am almost suspicious that there might be a memory problem or something
> that corrupts bits in the network layer. Do you have TSO enabled for your
> network interface by any chance? If so, I'd try disabling that on the
> network interface. Same goes for checksum offload.)
>=20
> rick
> ps: If you can capture packets between the client and server at the
>    time this error occurs, looking at them in wireshark might be
>    useful?

I will try all of those things.

But first, a question that someone who understands pkgng will be able to an=
swerr: Is this "fake-pkg" process even running on the NFS mount? The WRKDIR=
 is /tmp, which is an mfs mount.

Lars=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8A9F25C5-C5E6-4373-85F9-C47642CF1BAE>