Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:00:06 +0100 From: Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org> To: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@lists.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Packing netgraph structs Message-ID: <931572E3-CB5E-11D8-99F8-000A95DA50A6@recoil.org> In-Reply-To: <40E40839.20500@cronyx.ru> References: <122AE07F-CB5B-11D8-99F8-000A95DA50A6@recoil.org> <40E40839.20500@cronyx.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1 Jul 2004, at 13:48, Roman Kurakin wrote: > > If this is a problem why can't you make some wrapper that will > pack/unpack written on C, > which will be a lib for you? Because I want to minimise the size of the foreign bindings - this would require C code for every single Netgraph struct. If they were packed, I could just do it all in OCaml. Isn't this a problem for other language bindings as well, or is everyone doing Netgraph userland hacking in C at the moment? -- Anil Madhavapeddy http://anil.recoil.org University of Cambridge http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?931572E3-CB5E-11D8-99F8-000A95DA50A6>