Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:49:04 -0700
From:      Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
To:        Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net>
Cc:        freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: Help with improving mysql performance on 6.2PRE
Message-ID:  <9500A2C9-07EB-4EEA-9477-9E6B4BFEB437@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <A2430386-EB9D-4AEE-9144-F7D53D84A9F0@segment7.net>
References:  <3731.71.56.92.181.1160009571.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <200610120925.k9C9PmUK048690@lurza.secnetix.de> <20061012205342.GA62241@xor.obsecurity.org> <A2430386-EB9D-4AEE-9144-F7D53D84A9F0@segment7.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 13, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Eric Hodel wrote:
>>> Or did that change recently?
>>
>> It's only on certain systems, apparently.
>
> Is there a list of systems where it is safe to use the TSC with  
> SMP?  Or some script we can run?

The problem of the TSC clocks getting out of sync affects pretty much  
all AMD X2 dual-core CPUs, as well as the older 32-bit Althon MP  
CPUs; the Intel Xeon and Core Duo CPUs seem to do a lot better,  
although older Intel CPUs have also been reported to show problems  
with the TSC.

Disabling the fancy power-management capabilities (SpeedStep,  
PowerNow, Cool-n-quiet) to prevent the system from adjusting the CPU  
clock frequencies seems to reduce the extent of the problem.   
However, if you want your system clock to work reliably, using the  
ACPI-safe or i8254 timecounters is going to do much better than using  
the faster-but-unreliable TSC method.

-- 
-Chuck




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9500A2C9-07EB-4EEA-9477-9E6B4BFEB437>