Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:31:33 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@mu.org>, obrien@FreeBSD.org, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1 cgram.y decl.c emit.c emit1.c externs.h func.c init.c mem.c mem1.c scan.l tree.c src/usr.bin/xlint/lint2 chk.c hash.c main2.c msg.c read.c src/usr.bin/xlint/xlint xlint.c Message-ID: <95780.996053493@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:31:01 %2B0200." <62402.996046261@critter>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:31:01 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> I can't see any reason why the pre-commit check could whine if people attempt
> to take one or more files off vendorbranches, but on the other hand I would
> think that POLA dictates that we move _all_ vendor code under contrib
Seconded. I know at least wollman [1] thinks that contrib/ is a mistake,
but let's at least make it consistently.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
[1] In fact, I'm coming around to wollman's point of view on this, but
I'm still in favour of consistency.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?95780.996053493>