Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:40:21 +0200 From: Gabor PALI <pgj@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interpreted language(s) in the base Message-ID: <AANLkTinUpddVzUTTGn_vPpM-VskBfttsXm5u2ONtjtPJ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86r5htdqmu.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <4C6505A4.9060203@FreeBSD.org> <4C650B75.3020800@FreeBSD.org> <4C651192.9020403@FreeBSD.org> <i477eo$i4d$1@dough.gmane.org> <4C673898.2080609@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTim_prShRiHkLnFbhek9%2Beaa-KaJ5oZtNo%2BLd0K1@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1008152240370.66595@qbhto.arg> <20100818134341.GA88861@johnny.reilly.home> <AANLkTinHtzt=ELPvQBaaRBUzN-U88EXDMenZwrRsY3NL@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimNSG7aMvcuKytOjNAdSZe=pnqEvn0Pz8SpNki6@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=uYRb1Qph08HE2Ghgmobtge86H7Vi=v91z9Cc4@mail.gmail.com> <86r5htdqmu.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/8/20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no>: > Gabor PALI <pgj@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> Sorry for chiming in, just a quick idea. =A0If you find the "get a >> high-level language that compiled to C" idea good, > > I don't think it's a good idea Could you be more specific on your concerns? I am just curious. > I don't understand why this thread seems stuck in that rut. Perhaps because people want to write more reliable code faster? :g
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinUpddVzUTTGn_vPpM-VskBfttsXm5u2ONtjtPJ>