Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 13:43:49 +0000 From: Mikle Krutov <nekoexmachina@gmail.com> To: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: More stable and reliable NTFS driver for read-only access? Message-ID: <AANLkTinbKia17xRIjRYX3-RSHzwz--MUrhQKdz9Bk4bC@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100705133719.GA24489@icarus.home.lan> References: <AANLkTimxlLCBKAcfyYiRyE-lJDjuz5nQ-6LWxjHArZXY@mail.gmail.com> <20100705133719.GA24489@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you for infos! Also, i tried to compile ntfs driver just ten minutes ago and it not even compile for me on 8.1-PRERELEASE with bunch of errors. 2010/7/5, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com>: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 01:24:19PM +0000, Mikle Krutov wrote: >> Which ntfs driver is more reliable, stable >> and fast for read-only access, ntfs-3g or >> kernel one? >> Never ever had a contact with ntfs on >> fbsd, and friend of mine asks to backup >> his data to my machine (from ntfs hdd, >> formated in vista, if it makes any >> difference) > > I remember there being a thread last year sometime about the possibility > of NTFS support removed from the kernel due to its age, but I forget > what the outcome was. > > You're probably better off using something from ports, possibly with > fuse. > > -- > | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | > | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | > | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | > | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | > > -- with best regards, Krutov Mikle
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinbKia17xRIjRYX3-RSHzwz--MUrhQKdz9Bk4bC>