Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:31:53 +0300 From: Eir Nym <eirnym@gmail.com> To: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> Cc: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mk/bsd.command.mk: missing CSH tag Message-ID: <AANLkTinip-y9n2w=bJ7QKidymYTQSsmSiybxU7FWoY==@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86wro9e6e4.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4CE5280E.3090009@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <AANLkTin5v4NDNQyYDBCJ=r0OUo33vSqLF5a6rYCZQaS2@mail.gmail.com> <20101118160804.GA73849@eggman.experts-exchange.com> <AANLkTimkLmZNVWE1XG4vekHtYYrWWRk9-Jq8shJVdze1@mail.gmail.com> <ic5v05$146g$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <AANLkTinmZ2YXxMAPjghtur3n2GT-N16d0FFAc0=khb=k@mail.gmail.com> <86wro9e6e4.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 November 2010 17:26, Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> wrote: > Eir Nym <eirnym@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 19 November 2010 16:44, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote: >>> Eir Nym <eirnym@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Your patch should check if tcsh is in system. it is optional component. >>> >>> Since when? If you are missing /bin/csh, your system is defective >>> or at least nonstandard. >> >> It is good joke, thanks > > I guess he's talking about the ports tree being too fragile for some > non-default configurations and not many people are willing to fix it. > I understand this. Port can check this (because it is optional system component) and use another or generate error. > IOW, you can emphasize tcsh(1) being optional by stepping up to maintain > shells/tcsh. ;) > I prefer to create Makefile for make(1) or gmake(1) for this port or rewrite script to use sh(1)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinip-y9n2w=bJ7QKidymYTQSsmSiybxU7FWoY==>