Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:12:49 -0700 From: "Peter Steele" <psteele@webmail.maxiscale.com> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Is this a gmirror bug? Message-ID: <B8A480488C0C6849826655761349EA4338DA@owa.webmail.maxiscale.com> References: <B8A480488C0C6849826655761349EA4338D4@owa.webmail.maxiscale.com><alpine.BSF.2.00.0905262333080.48107@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl><20090526230522.GH49013@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> <20090527011302.98954329.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Wouldn't it look like > >Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >/dev/mirror/gm0d 4058062 -377792 4111210 110% /tmp >/dev/mirror/gm0e 15231278 -113942 14126718 101% /var > >then? I always assumed that a disk occupation > 100% would go into >this reserved area, which would turn the Capacity field to be more >than 100%, and not less than 0%? This is the case when I have more >data on a UFS partition than it "is allowed to"... I've seen this before a few times, but never something less than 0%. I've reimaged the system to correct it. Will have to see if it happens again...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B8A480488C0C6849826655761349EA4338DA>