Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:44:46 -0800
From:      Landon Fuller <landonf@bikemonkey.org>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= <ltning@anduin.net>
Cc:        freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Sparc64
Message-ID:  <BBFB1C9E-2679-4092-A483-B7B9BD55EBF0@bikemonkey.org>
In-Reply-To: <C4442CD9-D5D7-4E54-99FE-18061C6AA82B@anduin.net>
References:  <1A554062-5E54-4914-BC8A-AAD580D6EC27@anduin.net> <6643EEC4-3DEE-479D-9EA1-F907CB31B345@bikemonkey.org> <C4442CD9-D5D7-4E54-99FE-18061C6AA82B@anduin.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--Apple-Mail-46-173986886
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed


On Jan 31, 2008, at 13:43, Eirik =D8verby wrote:

> On Jan 31, 2008, at 10:37 PM, Landon Fuller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2008, at 14:42, Eirik =D8verby wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> an old boring question coming up again...
>>>
>>> For various reasons we have some interest in getting Java running =20=

>>> on FreeBSD-SPARC64. Also, the sun4v platform is of interest, but =20
>>> currently mostly academic such as the FreeBSD port to sun4v isn't =20=

>>> useful at this stage.
>>>
>>> We are using FreeBSD on a load of old SUN servers that their =20
>>> owners can't or won't dispose of. Having Java available would =20
>>> make these systems even more useful, and might bring in more =20
>>> business for us.
>>>
>>> So, put plainly, what kind of man-hours are we talking about to =20
>>> bring Java 1.5 to fbsd-sparc64?
>>
>> At first glance, it doesn't look to be more than a couple weeks of =20=

>> work (at the high end). Someone on the OpenJDK lists recently =20
>> asked about Linux/Sparc, which would require roughly the same =20
>> effort (implementing os_cpu for bsd_sparc):
>> 	=
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2007-September/=20
>> 000138.html
>> 	http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/porters-dev/2008-January/=20=

>> 000078.html
>>
>>> And what kind of money/support/inspiration would be needed to =20
>>> make this a priority?
>>
>> Seems like the biggest problem is access to freebsd/sparc64, and =20
>> -- of course -- finding someone sufficiently excited about doing =20
>> the porting work =3D)
>
> I can provide access to one or more jails on fbsd/sparc64. Even =20
> host access can be considered if necessary.

What's the status of svr4 emulation on sparc64? I forgot a critical =20
piece; One needs a bootstrap JVM, and bootstrapping off of Sun's VM =20
would make things easier.

-landonf=

--Apple-Mail-46-173986886
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
	name=PGP.sig
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFHok9elplZCE/15mMRApZXAJ9KmoKEA+HXBtq1fmkZwpnwxqa4aACeL+sJ
uKn7XF7s83GoyDTjASpkyQg=
=/4eT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail-46-173986886--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BBFB1C9E-2679-4092-A483-B7B9BD55EBF0>