Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:55:32 -0500
From:      Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
To:        Peter Gregorc <peter@paranoid-zine.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Re[2]: nat exclusion?
Message-ID:  <BF22DFA4-4C80-4C02-A34D-E173064550B8@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <273200033.20051102224545@paranoid-zine.com>
References:  <502337639.20051102220924@paranoid-zine.com> <2C66C948-04D0-4576-A158-992AAE5BECB8@mac.com> <273200033.20051102224545@paranoid-zine.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 2, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Peter Gregorc wrote:
> I've got 86.61.75.240/30
> .241 is for BSD
> .242 for WS1
> .243 broadcast
> So two are usable for outside usage, if NAT is disabled.

Sure, but normally, either .1 or .2 of a /30 subnet (ie, your .241  
or .242) is the externally-connected router of your ISP.  A few of  
the better ISP's will support switching their devices from being a  
router to acting like a bridge, thus requiring you to provide a dual- 
homed machine yourself.

How else are you going to provide a default route except by using an  
IP which is reachable on that subnet...?

-- 
-Chuck




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BF22DFA4-4C80-4C02-A34D-E173064550B8>