Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:54:41 +0000 From: Desmond Chapman <que_deseja@hotmail.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: RE: need help with vbox Message-ID: <BLU126-W35B1C6E35288446D2348D2ED330@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <gd71nn$mnr$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <BLU126-W3895D1CBA824D05E30D5A2ED330@phx.gbl> <gd70g0$kge$1@ger.gmane.org> <48F70904.8000702@cran.org.uk> <gd71nn$mnr$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gentleman=2C I agree with both of you. Thanks for everything. ---------------------------------------- > To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > From: ivoras@freebsd.org > Date: Thu=2C 16 Oct 2008 11:32:48 +0200 > Subject: Re: need help with vbox >=20 > Bruce Cran wrote: >> Ivan Voras wrote: >>> Desmond Chapman wrote: >>> =20 >>>> It's dependent upon kbuild. Since the developers have no intention of >>>> fixing the issue=2C I would like a tutorial on converting the kmk file >>>> to a normal Makefile. >>>> =20 >>> >>> What is kmk? Google only shows it's used with VirtualBox and nowhere >>> else. If it's something the authors of VirtualBox created=2C you'll hav= e >>> to ask them. >>> =20 >>=20 >> Apparently it's the tool used to build kbuild >> (http://svn.netlabs.org/kbuild/wiki/kmk=2C http://kbuild.sourceforge.net= /) >> projects. It seems it's what the Linux kernel build system uses. >=20 > Well=2C this seems to sum it up: >=20 > """ > Why not use vanilla GNU make? There are several reasons: > ... > # Finally=2C because we can. :-) > """ >=20 _________________________________________________________________ When your life is on the go=97take your life with you. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BLU126-W35B1C6E35288446D2348D2ED330>