Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:34:17 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> Cc: David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: armv6eb broken? Message-ID: <C4684392-329F-405A-A9CE-21A6A51220DB@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20130910093724.2be6332c@bender.Home> References: <522E47B1.2070904@delphij.net> <20130910093724.2be6332c@bender.Home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 10, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Andrew Turner wrote: > On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:12:01 -0700 > Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> wrote: >=20 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA512 >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> It seems that 'make tinderbox' is still broken for armv6eb, citing >> missing __sync_fetch_and_add_4 referenced in librt.so. I have no = idea >> on how to fix this though :-/ >=20 > My opinion is we should remove the armv6eb target. It was unsupported > by llvm & clang the last time I looked, and, as far as I can tell, we > have no boards that use it. Then what's triggering it? Just the tinderbox? If it is just the = tinderbox, let's remove it from there, but keep it in the rest of the = tree, since there's some tricky bits I did to make it compile in the = first place... Just because clang/llvm don't support it doesn't mean we = should actively remove the support from the rest of the system. External = tool chains do. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C4684392-329F-405A-A9CE-21A6A51220DB>