Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Jun 2021 00:30:46 -0700
From:      Mark Millard via freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: What happen to mailing list archives?
Message-ID:  <C833512F-09A0-4245-8DEE-8AE78E327627@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <0E72BE08-BC5A-41F8-8048-C5E8ADE947AF@yahoo.com>
References:  <0E72BE08-BC5A-41F8-8048-C5E8ADE947AF@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2021-Jun-6, at 13:25, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Baptiste Daroussin <bapt_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote on
> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 10:53:49 +0200 :
>=20
>> What has happended:
>> plan A: we migrated everything off mailman/pipermail seamlessly with =
redirection
>> and so on. We patched the new archiver to produce the same file names =
has
>> pipermail
>>=20
>> Plan A worked fine up to a limit, there was plenty of hand edition in =
the past,
>> we we decided to move to plan B which is what is happening now.
>>=20
>> Plan B: We keep a frozen version of the archives up to the migration =
date under
>> the pipermail directory and have the new archives created in the =
archives
>> directory.
>>=20
>> All the pipermail archives have been restored as they were. The new =
archives
>> receives in their index a new link to point people to the pipermails =
archive if
>> looking for older archives.
>>=20
>> this has been done a couple of hours ago (before Steve emails) during =
a window,
>> of ~ 10 hours, the mailing lists which slow traffic aka the one which =
didn't
>> received any email since the migration ended up with an empty =
"archives"
>> directory (aka a 404), a file with explanation and redirection to =
pipermail has
>> been installed there.
>>=20
>> Some work is still needed for the mailing lists which has been =
transformed as
>> readonly, this will be done in the next couple of days
>=20
> It is too bad that a reference to a "no examples yet"
> month, such as, (at the time I write this):
>=20
> =
https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-toolchain/2021-June/date.html
>=20
> does not show at least (Date view specific example):
>=20
> 	=E2=80=A2 Other periods:[ Previous, Date view ] [ List of =
Folders ]
> 	=E2=80=A2 Other: [ Actives mailing lists ] [ Archives from =
mailman's time ]
>=20
> when there are prior months available in
> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/ or show at least just:
>=20
> 	=E2=80=A2 Other: [ Actives mailing lists ] [ Archives from =
mailman's time ]
>=20
> when no prior months are available there.
>=20

Looks like there are missing months.

Using freebsd-hackers as an example:

https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers/index.html
shows the oldest month being "May 2021".

But . . .

https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/
shows the most recent month being "September 2020".

So: 2020-Oct through 2021-Apr are completely missing.

Then, going for more detail for 2020-Sep and 2021-May . . .

https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers/2021-May/date.html
shows "Starting Tue May 18 2021 - 21:07:44 UTC".

=
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2020-September/date.ht=
ml
shows "Ending: Tue Sep 15 14:12:20 UTC 2020".

So there are about 2 more half-months missing.

Some other lists have other date ranges, some similar,
some not.

=3D=3D=3D
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C833512F-09A0-4245-8DEE-8AE78E327627>