Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:03:11 +0200
From:      Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
To:        Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer@gmail.com>
Cc:        Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>,  "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: netmap-ipfw: kipfw two instances sharing same port
Message-ID:  <CA%2BhQ2%2Bjo1J52E=K_yT0-KO4_zbm-7MnEhvzghchifri8t7RuBA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEqdE_7cE7VBzRaXwtLod=KmsAvJudSyR--Dn5zhay_19OwGPA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAEqdE_6EEwyMur161KpKqas_gcJb2mnn-Zb_q65%2BObbJD2oePw@mail.gmail.com> <CALgsdbdTxc7T-hxd4LjO940d0RSHW7ttPQ%2BdfBwOGC=FYKow%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEqdE_4tkzuzdWSS=kHCzJF7yo=-1FxhijjeN2dUVc7fLHuYOg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bh5i5-B6D7fcv1sB-cCNfbu3ije7Ga6W7TO=Qat1MCGKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEqdE_7cE7VBzRaXwtLod=KmsAvJudSyR--Dn5zhay_19OwGPA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer@gmail.com> wrote=
:

> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov <
>>> pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello!
>>> >
>>> > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance
>>> of
>>> > kipfw on each pair:
>>> > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0
>>> > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1
>>> >
>>> > And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux
>>> > netmap).
>>> >
>>>
>>> Wow cool hint and cool numbers.
>>>
>>> I will get everything properly bridged on both kipfw instances, right?
>>>
>>> I need to simulate like a 3-port bridge... this would me more like
>>>
>>> kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0
>>> kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix2-0
>>>
>>> But I need the same traffic coming on the wire on ix0 to be available o=
n
>>> both ix1 and ix2.
>>>
>>
>> =E2=80=8Bit won't replicate traffic on the other two ports,
>> that's a different logic.
>>
>> cheers
>> luigi
>>
>
> yeah it's what I thought,
> different queues, different packets
>
> what about the first approach? should I expect issues?
>
> kipfw netmap:ix0 netmap:ix1
> kipfw netmap:ix0 netmap:ix2
>

=E2=80=8Bit won't do what anything sensible:
processes will compete for packets randomly
passing them to one or the other port.

=E2=80=8Bcheers
luigi=E2=80=8B



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BhQ2%2Bjo1J52E=K_yT0-KO4_zbm-7MnEhvzghchifri8t7RuBA>