Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Aug 2018 23:27:02 -0500
From:      Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>
To:        Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Cc:        Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: panic: mutex pmap not owned at ... efirt_machdep.c:255
Message-ID:  <CACNAnaFv9Gj%2BM2Gb8FbwY5q56dnTR6OgjZ5qth9gjr8LreHeow@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxg=4OnHEJa1OnJerMeEKD66nZg3j-H-XZ-9YAA1TE_NoDQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAF6rxg=4OnHEJa1OnJerMeEKD66nZg3j-H-XZ-9YAA1TE_NoDQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After installing the latest current kernel I get the following panic:
>
> panic: mutex pmap not owned at ... efirt_machdep.c:255
> cpuid =3
> time = 1
> ...
> mtx_assert()
> efi_arch_enter()
> efirt_modevents()
> module_register_init()
> mi_startup()
> btext()
>

This seems odd- pmap lock is acquired at [1], then asserted shortly
later at [2]... I avoid some of this stuff as well as I can, but is it
actually possible for PCPU_GET(...) acquired curpmap to not match
curthread->td_proc->p_vmspace->vm_pmap in this context?

[1] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/efidev/efirt.c?view=markup#l260
[2] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/amd64/amd64/efirt_machdep.c?view=markup#l254



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACNAnaFv9Gj%2BM2Gb8FbwY5q56dnTR6OgjZ5qth9gjr8LreHeow>