Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 01:46:29 -0600 From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bruno_Lauz=E9?= <brunolauze@msn.com> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: libinit idea Message-ID: <CACdU%2Bf9KVc7EKcVAN2vtyO7UvC%2BDM=iMsiQBmRzmA%2BcU1ZL=gA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BLU179-W28221A0539478FDDF45ADDC6840@phx.gbl> References: <BLU179-W28221A0539478FDDF45ADDC6840@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Bruno Lauz=E9 <brunolauze@msn.com> wrote: > https://github.com/brunolauze/libnit > > I know there's really big debate about init system but here's my tentativ= e to propose a new model to replace rc. > > Let's call it libinit but the name as no significance for now. > > I started coding a library with the following architecture. > > the main idea is to rewrite rc in C language. > > a utility called system would act a little bit like service command does. > > a folder would contains libraries instead of scripts inside [target]/etc/= rc.d > so we can add as many librairies a user desire and interlink the order of= each piece among all like in rc. > libraries don't belong in [target]/etc/rc.d, they would have to be in {/usr,}/lib{exec,}/rc.d or ${PREFIX}/lib{exec,}/rc.d --=20 DISCLAIMER: No electrons were maimed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACdU%2Bf9KVc7EKcVAN2vtyO7UvC%2BDM=iMsiQBmRzmA%2BcU1ZL=gA>