Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:52:12 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs) Message-ID: <CADLo83-XRD9KAXyfvggq0O4z0ezmpxm4Nu5GvFqvGS_ps0KNBg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201109131957.p8DJuxeE062191@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <CADLo838gUfrGhOYWYBym=5YiATyJy8r9bNdXCU8gmBjEbrEq6g@mail.gmail.com> <201109131957.p8DJuxeE062191@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13 Sep 2011 20:57, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> wrote: > > Hi, > Reference: > > From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> > > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:25:01 +0100 > > Message-id: <CADLo838gUfrGhOYWYBym= 5YiATyJy8r9bNdXCU8gmBjEbrEq6g@mail.gmail.com> > > Chris Rees wrote: > > On 13 September 2011 18:54, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Reference: > > >> From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> > > >> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:44:37 +0100 > > >> Message-id: < CADLo83-ZcVAeyznw5DtEHV1tOsBUrZLLR2HJxFjrX_QewpHysA@mail.gmail.com> > > > > > > Chris Rees wrote: > > >> On 12 September 2011 22:18, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote: > > >> > Matthias Andree wrote: > > >> >> >> An obscure piece of software is undesirable (and shouldn't be ported in > > >> >> >> the first place). > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Bullshit! > > >> >> > > >> >> I think that suffices. If the discussion is getting emotional, we > > >> >> should stop it. > > >> > > > >> > No. You should stop advocating killing ports, or leave, or be revoked. > > >> > FreeBSD would be better without immature ports slaughterers. > > >> > > > >> > > >> Julian, > > >> > > >> Your arguments have become excessively ad-hominem, and please don't > > >> think you're upsetting anyone in the slightest with them. > > >> > > >> Use rational and technical arguments, or take a break. > > >> > > >> Chris > > > > > > Your proposal to remove procmail among others was ridiculous. > > > Please consider resigning Chris. > > > > > > > Not mine. > > > > Please consider reading mailing lists properly rather than jumping to > > conclusions. > > > > Chris > > Chris Rees You are False. You posted this: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-September/069860.html > > > Chris Rees utisoft at gmail.com > > Sun Sep 4 16:56:37 UTC 2011 > > > > Guys, > > > > I've had to deprecate sysutils/cfs -- there's a confirmed issue with > > failing locks [1] which has been open for two years with no fix. > > > > Please would someone consider stepping up to fix and maintain it? It > > has two months to live. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Chris > > > > [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/137378 > > - - > > Chris Rees | FreeBSD Developer > > You then pressurised new Maintainer to fix quick or delete, > despite several of us told you in use working fine for ages. > > Chris Rees, you are butchering ports/ You were give a commit bit > 11th June 2011. http://www.freebsd.org/news/newsflash.html > > Its time that commit bit was revoked to protect ports/ along with > perhaps 3 other misguided butchers' commit bits, perhaps one of > whom might have been your commit mentor. > You are quite hilarious. I did not suggest depreciation of procmail, so I'm unsure why you keep asserting that. Why don't you count the number of ports I've actually 'butchered'? The cvs-ports list is public and easy to search. You're asserting that I've turned up and suddenly started to destroy the tree, which is anything but true, and I find it quite pathetic. Perhaps you need to take a break-- I'm rather tired of being called to defend myself, I've plenty of better things to be doing. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-XRD9KAXyfvggq0O4z0ezmpxm4Nu5GvFqvGS_ps0KNBg>