Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:37:14 -0700
From:      Julio Merino <jmmv@freebsd.org>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Cc:        sjg@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Can fmake be deleted?
Message-ID:  <CAFY7cWCSm5hMhsOovSfCNdcphGRYNdbaufTd31SHbwwTPF3DXA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140422202506.GA63561@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <CAFY7cWAdWETwZH1Cb_BQY%2B7Eh-kVd9n0V8a%2Bu1a6J069aWCONA@mail.gmail.com> <20140422202506.GA63561@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:20:46PM -0700, Julio Merino wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The WITHOUT_BMAKE=yes build has been broken for over a month and, as
>> far as I can tell, only tinderbox noticed... (Should be fixed with a
>> commit I made yesterday but tinderbox hasn't caught up yet.)
>>
>> Question: is there any reason to keep the old fmake around or could it
>> be deleted along all the MK_BMAKE logic?
>>
> At least for the ports side the plan is to drop fmake support as soon as
> possible.

What does that mean?

- Can ports drop support for fmake before fmake is removed from base?

- Can fmake be removed from base even if ports hasn't yet dropped its
support for fmake?

Thanks



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFY7cWCSm5hMhsOovSfCNdcphGRYNdbaufTd31SHbwwTPF3DXA>