Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:26:33 +0000 From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> To: delphij@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/164290: FreeBSD 9.0 IS NOT YET PRODUCTION/STABLE Message-ID: <CAFYkXj=s_bOqEjxitGLz-cXMsebWaNqtRS2B2=ST4EzKk4oc3w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201201182118.q0ILIYaq079339@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201201182118.q0ILIYaq079339@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:18 PM, <delphij@freebsd.org> wrote: > Synopsis: FreeBSD 9.0 IS NOT YET PRODUCTION/STABLE > I'm closing this PR because it does not contain any details about the > hardware nor have any proposal about how to deal with the problem. > > Please, become an active participant of the project by downloading and > testing the images when we are doing BETA and RCs, and shout out loudly > if you hit some bugs and these problems gets addressed. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164290 Then simply call for testing, work more on making it stable, and when its stable mark it stable. The logical consequence of releasing unstable as production is to lie to users. New people that install 9.0 release/stable that even won't install will never look at this system again, the changes instroduced in 9.0 makes even me want to switch to another os :-( -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFYkXj=s_bOqEjxitGLz-cXMsebWaNqtRS2B2=ST4EzKk4oc3w>