Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 20:12:22 -0500 From: Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> To: Big Lebowski <spankthespam@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays? Message-ID: <CAGBxaXnXwo4JxnRdffZfdvfETfhgJNkFM-N23H1SOT0G3-oMwA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAHcXP%2Bew5qt5hc9Y%2BR_njPkfhUMsDDAqNk9aYSacV4PwBmqjfw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAHcXP%2Bf6e-t--XbQPTH1goJp_CL7P=zTj5trZVWd4YZ_EsO9gw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGBxaX=t3e5SXoBDHnzAbx=SWbEFMJHNPQL13FnwNgKWM3gCiA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHcXP%2Bew5qt5hc9Y%2BR_njPkfhUMsDDAqNk9aYSacV4PwBmqjfw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I think you've got me wrong - I am following freebsd-virtualization list > very closely, and the matter I've touched here is not my doubt on which > technology I should use, but rather a complaint on the state of jails > related tools directly leading to the delays in handling of ports related > PR's. I know the technology alternatives, I am decided to jails for a > reason, and I also know your work on the web interface focusing on bhyve, > but its not about it. > My point is writing scripts for VM's is easier (nothing more then copy the master and then do a normal make install/portmaster on the port of you choice [better to run them one at a time I have found). When I get into port testing I usually have 3 VM's on the host working on compiling and 1 for development. I have yet to find a good way to have 4 jails running as independentlu. -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGBxaXnXwo4JxnRdffZfdvfETfhgJNkFM-N23H1SOT0G3-oMwA>