Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:22:03 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com> Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>, Xin LI <delphij@freebsd.org>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need to force sync(2) before umounting UFS1 filesystems? Message-ID: <CAGH67wS9G5Co%2BCjaVWrc-VX-mmp7CoEo0Cw7ysqpwkOMowRYCQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201110012137.p91Lb6FI093841@chez.mckusick.com> References: <CAGH67wSYmcxJCbTMVL%2BqWzbLojiCiBmRF98yaNL4b3d3LbvbYw@mail.gmail.com> <201110012137.p91Lb6FI093841@chez.mckusick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com> wrote= : >> Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 12:44:04 -0700 >> Subject: Re: Need to force sync(2) before umounting UFS1 filesystems? >> From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> >> To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> >> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>, freebsd-fs@freebs= d.org, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Xin LI <delphij@freebsd.org> >> >> Ok. Now that I know this is the direction you guys want to go, I'll >> start testing the change. > > Thanks for throwing some testing at this. Please test my latest > proposed change (included below so you do not have to dig through > earlier email) as I believe that it has the least likelyhood of > problems and is what I am currently proposing to put in. I apologize for not getting this done sooner. It passes a smoke test with the following filesystems: nfs nullfs smbfs unionfs ufs zfs I'll be running more extensive stress tests soon, but it looks like a good step forward. Thanks! -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wS9G5Co%2BCjaVWrc-VX-mmp7CoEo0Cw7ysqpwkOMowRYCQ>